The ‘uberisation’ of work. Is the digital labour platform a mere intermediary, given the significant control exercised on ‘platform workers’?
PDF (Română)
HTML (Română)

Keywords

digital work platforms
mobile apps
location
significant control
platform workers

Abstract

The 'uberization' of work describes a digital labour market in which platforms act as mere intermediaries, with services provided by self-employed users. While the reasoning is valid for some platforms, at least in the case of location-based mobile apps it can be questioned. In our analysis we will try to show that, starting from the conditions of the service provided, which are unilaterally set by the platform, it cannot be denied that there is a significant control exercised over 'platform workers', by providing some relevant case law in this respect. Consequently, as will be shown in the conclusions, the situation is diffuse since these workers are performing an activity which they cannot organize themselves, although they are theoretically self-employed.

https://doi.org/10.24193/SUBBiur.68(2023).2.4
PDF (Română)
HTML (Română)

References

ALBANEZI A., Platformele Multilaterale la Intersecția dintre Dreptul Societar și Dreptul Muncii, 2023, teză dactilo., Biblioteca central Universitară „Lucian Blaga”, Cluj-Napoca, cota: TEZE10315;

CAILLAUD B., Julien B., Competing cyberintermediaries, European Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 4-6, May 2001;

STEFANO de V., The Rise of the Just-in-Time Workforce: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labor Protection in the Gig-Economy, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, Spring 2016;

EVANS D. S., HAGIU A., SCHMALENSEE R, Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries, Edit. The MIT Press, Massachusates, 2006;

GOODWIN T., The battle is for the customer interface, 2015, online: https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/03/in-the-age-of-disintermediation-the-battle-is-all-for-the-customer-interface/;

HIEßL Ch., The classification of platform workers in caselaw: A cross European comparative analysis, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, vol. 42.2, 2022 Forthcoming, online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3982738;

PROSERPIO D., TELLIS G. J, Baring the Sharing Economy: Concepts, Classification, Findings, and Future Directions, 2017, online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3084329;

ROȘIORU F., The Status of Platform Workers in Romania, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, Fall 2020;

ROȘIORU F., Accesoriu sau integrat în activitatea angajatorului: Cazul Uber, RRDP, 2/2021;

SRNICEK N., Platform capitalism, Edit. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2017.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.