Rezumat
The concept of autonomy lies at the core of the distinctiveness of European Union law and of the EU’s legal order. While the EU system is a creation drawing features from both an international organization and a federal state, the European Court of Justice has strongly proclaimed in its case law the sui generis nature of the Union as a supranational entity, relying heavily on autonomy as a key principle of the Union’s legal order. Without purporting to cover the full spectrum of possible analytical approaches, this paper examines some of the conceptions regarding the nature and dichotomies characterizing the autonomy of EU law, which might prove helpful in mapping the evolution of the notion into an ‘existential’ principle of the EU. The paper also discusses the internal and external dimensions of autonomy, with an emphasis on the latter, illustrating the evolution of external perceptions and the EU’s dynamics on the international plane.
Referințe bibliografice
ALTER, K., Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (OUP 2001);
AZOULAI, L., ‘Structural Principles in EU Law: Internal and External’ in Marise Cremona (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Bloomsbury 2018);
BERCEA, R., ‘Le temps de l’adhésion n’est toujours pas venu – Notes en marge de l’Avis 2/13 du 18 décembre 2014 de la Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne’ (2015) 5(1) Revista Română de Drept Comparat 88;
BERCEA, R., Protecția drepturilor fundamentale în sistemul Convenției Europene a Drepturilor Omului (C.H. Beck 2020);
BINDER, C., HOFFBAUER, J.A., ‘The Perception of the EU Legal Order in International Law: An In- and Outside View’ in Marc Bungenberg, Markus Krajewski, Christian Tams, Jorg Philipp Terhechte and Andreas R. Ziegler (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017 (Springer 2017);
BLAUBERGER, M., SCHMIDT, S.K., ‘The European Court of Justice and Its Political Impact’ (2017) 40(4) West European Politics 907;
BOTĂU, D., ‘La Cour Constitutionnelle de la Roumanie et le droit de l’Union européenne. Amitié ou réserve?’ in O.A. Macovei (dir.), La décennie européenne de la Roumanie et la Bulgarie. Le bilan d’une appartenance différencié à l’Union européenne (mare & martin 2022);
BOTĂU, D, VALENTIN, C., Drept internațional. Partea generală, (Hamangiu 2023) 217 et seq.;
CONTARTESE, C., ANDENAS, M., ‘EU autonomy and investor-state dispute settlement under inter se agreements between EU Member States: Achmea’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 157;
CREMONA, C., ‘Structural Principles and Their Role in EU External Relations Law’ in Marise Cremona (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Bloomsbury 2018);
DAWSON M., DE WITTE B., MUIR E., (eds.), Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice (Edward Elgar Publishing 2013);
DE BURCA, G., ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’ (2010) 51(1) Harv. Int'l L.J. 1 ;
DE WITTE, B., ‘A Selfish Court? The court of Justice and the Design of International Dispute Settlement Beyond the European Union’ in Marise Cremona and Anne Thies (eds.), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges (Hart Publishing 2014);
DE WITTE, B., ‘European Union Law: How Autonomous is Its Legal Order?’ (2010) 65(1) Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 142;
DHOOGHE, V., FRANKEN, R., OPGENHAFFEN, T., ‘Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice: A Natural Feature in a Dialogical Context’ (2015) 20 Tilburg Law Review (2015) 122;
DOROGA, S., MERCESCU, A., ‘A Call to Impossibility: The Methodology of Interpretation at the European Court of Justice and the PSPP ruling’ (2021) 13 European Journal of Legal Studies 87, DOI: 10.2924/EJLS.2021.006;
DOUGLAS-SCOTT, S., Constitutional Law of the European Union (Longman 1st edition 2002);
ECKES, C., ‘The European Court of Justice and (Quasi-)Judicial Bodies of International Organisations’, in Ramses A. Wessel, Steven Blockmans (eds.) Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations (Springer 2013);
ECKES, C., ‘International Rulings and the EU Legal Order: Autonomy as Legitimacy?’ in Marise Cremona, Anne Thies, Ramses A. Wessel (eds.), The European Union and International Dispute Settlement (Bloomsbury 2017);
EECKHOUT, P., ‘Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR and Judicial Dialogue – Autonomy or Autarky?’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/15, available at http://jeanmonnetprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/JMWP-01-Eeckhout1.pdf (last visited May 20, 2024);
EDWARDS, D., ‘Judicial Activism—Myth or Reality? Van Gend en Loos, Costa v. ENEL and the Van Duyn Family Revisited’ in Angus I. K. Campbell, Meropi Voyatzi (eds.), Essays in the Honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart (Trenton 1996);
FIKFAK, V., ‘Kadi and the Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the International Legal Order’ (2012-2013) 15 Cambridge Y.B. Eur. Legal Stud. 587;
GÁSPÁR-SZILÁGYI, S., ‘It is Not Just About Investor-State Arbitration: A Look at Case C-284/16, Achmea BV’, European Papers (30 May 2018), available at http://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/it-is-not-just-about-investor-state-arbitration-achmea-case (last visited May 20, 2024);
ILC, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, finalized by Martti Koskenniemi (2006), UN Document A/CN.4/L.682;
JONES, M.L., ‘The Legal Nature of the European Community: A Jurisprudential Analysis using H.L.A. Hart’s Model of Law and a Legal System’ (1984) 17(1) Cornell International Law Journal 1;
HALLESKOV STORGAARD, L. ‘EU Law Autonomy versus European Fundamental Rights Protection—On Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR’ (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 485;
KLABBERS, J., ‘The Changing of International Organizations’ in Jean-Marc Coicaud, Veijo Heiskanen (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Organizations (United Nations University Press 2001);
KLABBERS, J., ‘Presumptive Personality: The European Union in International Law’ in Martti Koskenniemi (ed.) International Law Aspects of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1997);
KLAMERT, M. ‘The Autonomy of the EU (And of EU Law): Through the Kaleidoscope’ (2017) 42(6) European Law Review 815;
LAUTERPACHT, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (OUP 1933);
MERCESCU, A. "Is There Generic Law? The Issue of Constitutionalism" in S. Glanert, A. Mercescu and G. Samuel, Rethinking Comparative Law (Edward Elgar, 2021);
MOLNÁR, T., ‘The Concept of Autonomy of EU Law from the Comparative Perspective of International Law and the Legal Systems of Member States’ in Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 2015 (Eleven International Publishing 2016);
ODERMATT, J.,‘The Principle of Autonomy: An Adolescent Disease of EU External Relations Law?’ in Marise Cremona (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Bloomsbury 2018);
PIRKER, B.H., REITEMEYER, S., ‘Between Discursive and Exclusive Autonomy – Opinion 2/13, the Protection of Fundamental Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law’ (2015) 17 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 171;
RASMUSSEN, M., ‘Revolutionizing European Law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment’ (2014) 12(1) I•CON 140;
RICHMOND, C., ‘Preserving the Identity Crisis: Autonomy, System and Sovereignty in European Law’ (1997) 16(4) Law and Philosophy 377;
SIMMA, B., PULKOWSKI, D, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17(3) EJIL 483;
SHUIBHNE, N.N.,‘What Is the Autonomy of EU Law, and Why Does That Matter?’ (2019) 88(1) Nordic Journal of International Law 10;
TRIDIMAS, T., The General Principles of EU Law (OUP 2006);
TSAGOURIAS, N., ‘Conceptualizing the Autonomy of the European Union’, in Richard Collins, Nigel D. White (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy (Routledge 2011);
WEILER, J.H.H., ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2422;
WEILER, J.H.H., HALTERN, U.R., ‘Constitutional or International? The Foundations of the Community Legal Order and the Question of Judicial Kompetenz-Kompetenz’ in Anne-Marie Slaughter, Alec Stone Sweet, Joseph Weiler (eds.), The European Courts and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence (Bloomsbury 1998);
WEILER, J.H.H., ‘Rewriting Van Gend en Loos: Towards a Normative Theory of ECJ Hermeneutics’ in Ola Wiklund (ed.), Judicial Discretion in European Perspective (Kluwer Law International 2003);
WESSEL R.A., Blockmans, S., ‘Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations – An Introduction’ Ramses A. Wessel, Steven Blockmans (eds.) Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations (Springer 2013);
ZIEGLER, K.S., ‘Beyond Pluralism and Autonomy: Systemic Harmonization as a Paradigm for the Interaction of EU Law and International Law’ (2016) 35(1) Yearbook of European Law 667.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.